|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best viewed @ 1024 x 768 and higher
Testing: Rather than spam your brains with endless game benchmarks, only a few newer and older games known to really tax a system were used such as Fear, Call of Duty 4, and Stalker. 3DMark is simply one of the best 3D graphics intensive program that benchmarks the entire system. Resolutions were set to 1440x900 on the trusty Viewsonic throughout testing.
As you can see in the results, the
processor is still a viable option and can do just fine against some of the
newer, more power hungry game titles. The scores aren't as high as the E6600,
but they are close. And the frame rates are high enough that you don't have to
run out and upgrade to an Intel system to play.
One thing that the AMD processors
have always had going for them is the integrated memory controller. This allows
AMD's AM2 processors to push more memory bandwidth than the Intel processors.
You can see the extra performance a little overclocking can give using the
SANDRA Memory Benchmark. It's sometimes hard to understand why all this extra
bandwidth hasn't been put to better use. It seems like a huge waste especially
without the chipsets to support and tap in to the potential.
To be honest, a 600 to 700MHz
overclock from 2.6GHz isn't all that great. Part of it is due to the Abit AN9
32X's limitations and the other part is due to the processor. There isn't a
great deal more head room without adding a lot more voltage to the chipsets and
processor. Still, reaching 3.3GHz was at least effortless and showed some
noticeable performance. Also, consider the very low or non-existent risk to
overclocking the processor and higher frequency RAM. As long as your motherboard
has the ability, the processor can afford to operate at these frequencies days
on end. If all processors came unlocked, the possibilities would be endless.
This may or may not come as a shock, but I'm not an Intel or AMD fan boy. I
choose to use what has the greatest performance at the best price I can afford.
And until one of these two processor giants hire me on staff, I'll continue to
be the quintessential consumer who wants his money's worth no matter what
processor is at the top of its game.
If a processor helps a game system achieve 140 frames while the other achieves
only 125 frames, do you really think you're going notice? That's why it really
comes down to what you do with your system. If you're on a budget or play mostly
games, that $115 AMD X2 5000+ Black Edition processor starts to look a really
sweet deal. This processor coupled with an 8800 GTS or GTX, whether one or two,
is obviously a cheaper solution than spending your money on a whole new system.
<< Details & Installation | VH Main Page >>
Got News? Send 'em in!
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |
|